What Supply Chain Leaders Are Asking for in 2026 And What It Means for the Industry

Picture of Molly Harrison, Chief Operating Officer, Kaleris

Molly Harrison, Chief Operating Officer, Kaleris

There is something genuinely irreplaceable about sitting across from customers—whether in person or virtually—and having a real conversation. Not a sales call or a status update. A real conversation about what’s working, what isn’t, what keeps them up at night, and what they’re most excited about on the road ahead. 
 
Over the past several months, I’ve had the privilege of spending meaningful time with many of our strategic and lighthouse customers spanning leaders who run ports, terminals, intermodal hubs, and transportation logistics networks. After listening closely, I want to share what I’m hearing and why it matters for where the industry is headed in 2026 and beyond.  

What we’re hearing reflects a shift in how operational leaders are thinking about technology, performance, and partnership. And those signals are shaping how Kaleris shows up as a company. Here are a few of the themes that stand out most. 


Metrics Matter 

Operational metrics are not new. Most organizations already track KPIs such as throughput, dwell time, equipment utilization, and similar indicators. What’s changing is the expectation of what those metrics should do. 

We’re seeing a growing emphasis on measurement that ties directly to business outcomes. Operators are asking tougher questions: Which KPIs actually influence cost per move? Where does improved yard velocity translate into measurable financial impact? How do operational gains stand up in conversations with finance and leadership teams? 

The focus is shifting toward metrics that drive decisions and clearly connect operational performance to return on investment. 

Peer Insight Matters More Than Ever 

Another consistent theme is the value of learning from peers. Operational leaders want to understand how comparable organizations are approaching similar challenges. 

How is congestion managed differently at a port operating under similar constraints, but in another region? What practices are leading rail and intermodal operators using to improve asset turns or reduce friction at handoffs? 

As global supply chains grow more interconnected, the appetite for contextual, experience-based insight is increasing. The opportunity, and responsibility, is to share that learning thoughtfully, with appropriate context and respect for operational nuance. 

Continuous Improvement Is an Operating Discipline 

The strongest performance gains we observe tend to come from organizations that treat optimization as an operating discipline rather than a one‑time initiative. 

Regular business reviews and consistent communication amongst teams create the conditions for meaningful progress. These engagements are geared towards identifying friction early, addressing it pragmatically, and tracking improvements over time. 

While these learnings rarely produce overnight success, the steady gains accumulate faster execution, better resource utilization, and measurable cost savings. 

Roadmaps Should Reflect Patterns 

Another expectation we hear consistently is clarity around how feedback influences product direction. Operators want confidence that their input contributes to real decisions. 

The challenge is balancing individual needs with broader patterns. The most effective roadmaps are shaped by recurring themes across many customers and market needs. Visibility into that process matters because it builds trust that investment decisions are grounded in real operational demand. 

AI Has Moved from Concept to Decision 

The conversation around artificial intelligence has evolved considerably. Not long ago, discussions focused on possibilities. Today, they’re focused on driving outcomes through execution. 

Operational leaders are asking specific, practical questions: Which predictive maintenance use cases have demonstrated value? Where has intelligent automation improved gate or yard performance at scale? How do advanced planning capabilities integrate with existing systems? 

This shift signals maturity. The question is no longer whether AI will matter in terminal, rail, and yard operations, but where it delivers meaningful results and how it can be applied responsibly within complex operating environments. 


A Shared Responsibility to Move the Industry Forward 

Taken together, these themes point to an important reality that the supply chain industry is becoming more sophisticated, more analytical, and more intentional about how technology is applied. 

For Kaleris, that means maintaining transparency around where we’re headed and why. The responsibility that comes with supporting mission‑critical operations is significant, and one we take seriously. 

The best outcomes emerge from ongoing dialogue, mutual accountability, and a willingness to learn on both sides. Those conversations are worth the time. They shape better decisions, better technology, and ultimately, better operations. 
 
These themes also reveal that the global supply chain is, at its core, a people business, supported by sophisticated technology. The kind of trust that gets built over years of working through disruptions, navigating market volatility, and finding efficiencies together cannot be replicated with a dashboard. It is earned, one honest conversation at a time.